Mutation specific approaches

Exon skipping and stop codon readthrough are mutation specific therapeutic approaches. This means that they will only work for subsets of patients who have specific mutations (see the following pages for more information). To know whether a Duchenne patient is eligible for exon skipping or stop codon readthrough it is important to have a full genetic diagnosis of the disease (i.e. the disease causing mutation in the dystrophin gene needs to be identified).

Exon skipping

Aim:

To correct the genetic code and allow the production of a partially functional dystrophin.

Background:

The genetic code of genes is dispersed over so called exons. When a protein needs to be made, genes make a temporary copy (called RNA). Before this RNA can be translated into protein the exons first need to be joined and the intermittent pieces that do not contain the genetic code (introns) need to be removed. This is a process that is called "splicing".

In Duchenne patients the genetic code of the dystrophin gene is disrupted, meaning that the code become unreadable, which results in premature truncation of the translation from gene into protein. In Becker patients mutations maintain the genetic code, allowing for a protein that maintains the functional domains.

Exon skipping aims to restore the genetic code from Duchenne patients, so a partially functional, Becker-like dystrophin protein can be made, rather than a non-functional Duchenne protein. This is achieved by AONs (antisense oligonucleotides). AONs are small pieces of modified RNA that recognize a target exon, bind to it and hide it from the splicing machinery. This results in the skipping of said exon and restoration of the genetic code.

Annemieke Aartsma-Rus explains exon skipping in this movie.

Exon skipping is also explained in this 'Dance your PhD' video.

AON treatment has induced exon skipping resulting in the production of Becker-like dystrophins in patient-derived cultured cells and the mdx mouse model. In the mouse model, this was accompanied by functional improvement.

There are different types of AONs (chemistries).

Applicability:

For different mutations and types of mutations different exons need to be skipped to restore the genetic code. As most patients have a deletion and these cluster in a hotspot, the skipping of some exons applies to more patients than others. An image representation of the exons in the dystrophin gene is available here. A much more comprehensive discussion of exon skipping, including images that help to visualize the way it works, is available here.

While exon skipping would be beneficial to the majority of mutations, there are some exceptions.

Exon 51 skipping: Since exon 51 skipping applies to the largest group of patients, AONs targeting exon 51 have been developed furthest. One exon skipping AON of the morpholino (PMO) chemistry called eteplirsen has received accelerated approval from the FDA. Evaluation by EMA is pending.

 

 

Clinical trials with Eteplirsen:

The PMO AON targeting exon 51 is currently called Eteplirsen or Exondys51. It needs to be administered by intravenous infusion. Etepliresen was tested in 19 patients at different doses up to 20 mg/kg. Since not all patients in this trial responded equally well, a follow up trial testing two higher doses was done in a small trial involving 12 patients. In this study, dystrophin was restored for all patients after 24 weeks of eteplirsen treatment. Patients have now been treated for over 188 weeks and for the 10 patients who are still ambulant the 6 minute walk distance declined less than would be anticipated from the natural history (although this should be interpreted with caution given the small group size).

A phase 3 trial where weekly intravenous dosing with 30 mg/kg Eteplirsen is tested for 96 weeks in ambulant patients is currently ongoing in the USA. This is an open label study, where patients with mutations amenable to exon 51 skipping are treated, while patients with non-amenable mutations are used as controls for functional tests and safety. In addition, open label trials have been initiated in the USA in young patients (less than 6 years old) and in patients with limited or no ambulation. In the trial in young patients, again a group with non-amenable mutations is used as a control.

FDA announced September 19 2016 that Eteplirsen was granted accelerated approval. This was based only on small increases in dystrophin observed in muscle biopsies of treated patients. FDA specifically specified that functional effects are not yet confirmed. As such, Sarepta will have to confirm clinical benefit in additional clinical trials that are currently ongoing and will be planned. In December 2016 Sarepta filed for approval with the European Medicines Agency. Evaluation is currently pending.

Eteplirsen induces only small increases in dystrophin expression. As such there is room for improved AON compounds. Sarepta is currently testing a form of eteplirsen that is linked to a peptide-conjugate that should improve AON uptake by tissues (so called pPMO). In addition, Wave therapeutics has initiated an exon 51 skipping trial with a new AON modification.

 

Consideration 3:

AONs to skip different exons are considered different drugs by the regulatory agencies. This means that developing AONs for different exons is very costly and time consuming, as each has to go through all stages of preclinical and clinical development.

 

Hopefully, AON development will become faster after the first 2 or 3. TREAT-NMD is coordinating a discussion about this with regulatory agencies on behalf of exon skipping scientists, clinicians and industry and the patient community. The most recent meeting was held on April 29 2015. The resulting publication is now available (free copy can be found here).

Clinical development for AONs targeting other exons:

Sarepta has completed a trial for PMOs targeting exon 53 (golodirsen, collaboration with Francesco Muntoni in London). After 48 weeks of treatment an increase in dystrophin expression of ~1% was observed. Based on this, Sarepta will apply for FDA approval for golodirsen in Q4 of 2018. Sarepta has initiated a placebo-controlled, 96 week phase 3 trial to evaluate exon 45 (casimersen) and 53 AONs.

Nippon Shinyaku (Japan) is currently conducting a clinical trial with PMOs for exon 53 skipping in Japan. A placebo-controlled safety and dose finding trial followed by an open label phase with this compound is ongoing in ambulatory patients in the USA. Nippon Shinyaku also is evaluating and with AONs with the ENA chemistry for exon 45 in Japan.

Clinical trials with drisapersen (discontinued):

The 2OMePS AON targeting exon 51 is called Drisapersen or Kyndrisa. All patients involved in an early subcutaneous trial were enrolled in an open label extension study where they receive weekly treatment with Drisapersen. Patients were treated for more than 6 years (including treatment breaks). For 8/10 patients still ambulant at the start of the extension study the 6 minute walk distance has stabilized, while the natural history would predict a decrease. However, lacking a placebo group, these results should be interpreted with caution.

GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) had in-licensed Drisapersen, from Prosensa and has coordinated several trials. In all trials using subcutaneous injection of Drisapersen injection site reactions and proteinuria were more frequently observed in Drisapersen treated patients than placebo treated patients. A trial comparing different dosing regimens has been completed in patients who were at a relatively early stage of the disease. This study involved 54 patients receiving either placebo, weekly subcutaneous treatment with Drisapersen or an intermittent regimen for 48 weeks. Both treated groups walked ~35 meters more than placebo-treated patients in the 6 minute walk test.

A trial comparing different doses has been completed in patients who were in an early disease stage (able to rise from floor in 15 seconds). Patients received placebo, 3 or 6 mg/kg Drisapersen for 24 weeks. Patients treated with 6 mg/kg walked 27 meter more than patients treated with placebo or 3 mg/kg after 24 weeks.

A Phase III placebo-controlled trial was initiated in 2011, to assess the safety and effectiveness of treatment with Drisapersen in 186 ambulant patients. No significant difference in the distance walked in 6 minutes was observed between placebo and Drisapersen treated patients at 48 weeks. Meanwhile, GSK has returned the license to develop Drisapersen to Prosensa and Prosensa has been acquired by BioMarin.

Prosensa/Biomarin have analysed the compiled data of the systemic trials and extension studies. Results are suggestive of a slower disease progression in treated younger patients but also older patients who are treated for 24 months. Based on these data they have filed for Accelerated Approval with the Food and Drug Administration and for Marketing Autorization with the European Medicine Agency in 2015.  Furthermore, they have started the phased redosing of patients in open label extension studies with Drisaperson (which were stopped after the phase III trial results were reported). The FDA reported on Jan 14 2016 that Drisapersen is currently not ready for approval.

On May 31 2016 BioMarin announced withdrawal of their application with EMA. They have discontinued the development of drisapersen and also other AONs that were in clinical development targeting exon 44, 45 and 53. They are currently working on the development of more effective and more save exon skipping compounds.
Drugs for stop codon read-through>
 
25 Apr 2018